Recent incidents involving the death of employees and students after being denied sick leave or allegedly facing extreme work stress have ignited a global conversation about workplace culture and the responsibilities of managers in handling employee well-being. The discussion was triggered when the mother of Anna Sebastian Perayil, a 26-year-old Ernst & Young (EY) employee, accused the company of overworking her daughter to death. The allegations have since raised questions about the extent to which employers can deny sick leave, the responsibility of managers in high-pressure workplaces, and the growing risks posed by toxic work environments.

Anna Sebastian Perayil’s death became the focal point of public outrage when her mother penned an emotional letter, claiming her daughter had been driven to her death by the demands of her job at EY. The case has since spread across social media, sparking widespread discussions about the impact of workplace stress and overwork on employees’ mental and physical health. Critics have called for an overhaul of corporate policies that prioritize productivity over employee welfare, with Anna’s case serving as a grim reminder of the need for balance between work demands and personal health.

Also read: Fathers can identify their children based on body odor. This connection to daughters fades as puberty hits

Can Managers Deny Sick Leave?

One of the pressing questions in the wake of these incidents is whether a manager can legally deny sick leave. The answer depends on several factors, including company policies, labor laws, and the circumstances surrounding the employee's request. Although some organizations allow managers to deny leave in certain situations, such as a lack of documentation or an employee's abuse of sick leave, these decisions can have serious repercussions, especially if they result in an employee's health deteriorating further.

Also read: The Sex-Life Secret to Longevity! Women who rarely have sex are at an increased risk of dying, study finds

Key scenarios where a manager might deny sick leave include:

Lack of Documentation: If an employee cannot provide required medical documentation, a manager may deny the request.

Exhausted Sick Leave: If an employee has used up their paid sick leave, a manager may refuse additional leave, though unpaid or alternative leave might still be an option.

Pattern of Abuse: If a manager suspects abuse of sick leave, particularly around weekends or holidays, they may deny the request.

Critical Work Deadlines: In rare cases, a manager might ask an employee to delay sick leave during essential work periods, though genuine illness should take priority.

Company Policies and Law: Some countries or regions have laws that require employers to grant sick leave, and denying it might violate labor laws. For example, in many countries, employees are legally entitled to a certain amount of sick leave each year.

India's Laws on Sick Leave

In India, sick leave policies vary significantly between the private sector and government organizations. Private companies typically establish their own policies, though some align with the Factories Act of 1948, which mandates one day of paid sick leave for every 20 days worked, up to 18 days per year. In contrast, central government employees are entitled to 15 days of paid sick leave annually under the Central Civil Services (Leave Rules) Act of 1972.

State government employees are subject to state-specific regulations. For example, civil servants in Maharashtra are eligible for 12 days of paid sick leave each year, with varying rules for medical leave.

In a tragic incident in Gwalior recently, a pharmacy student suffering from dengue fever was allegedly denied sick leave by his university. The denial reportedly led to his untimely death, which has sparked student protests and widespread condemnation of the university administration. Protesters are demanding a thorough investigation into the university’s policies regarding student health, raising concerns about the value placed on students’ well-being and the pressures of academic life.

A 30-year-old woman from Thailand, identified as May, tragically died after her manager denied her request for additional sick leave. May, who had previously taken several days off due to an inflamed large intestine, collapsed at work after being forced to return before she had fully recovered. The incident highlights the dangers of ignoring an employee’s health concerns and has sparked a similar outcry over corporate responsibility in ensuring worker safety.

In Lucknow, 45-year-old Sadaf Fatima died after allegedly collapsing under the pressure of work. Fatima, who fell off her chair at her office, was rushed to the hospital but was declared dead upon arrival. Her colleagues have pointed to work-related stress as a contributing factor to her death. This incident, like many others, has put a spotlight on the mental health crisis among workers and the urgent need for reforms in workplace policies.

The case has also drawn political attention, with Samajwadi Party leader Akhilesh Yadav expressing concerns over the rising work-related fatalities. In a statement, Yadav described the incident as a symptom of economic pressure in the country, urging both private and public sectors to reassess how they manage human resources. Yadav emphasized that the true progress of a nation lies in the happiness and mental well-being of its citizens, not just in economic output.

A global crisis in workplace culture?

These recent cases, from India to Thailand, underscore a growing global crisis in workplace culture. Overwork, stress, and denial of sick leave are emerging as systemic problems that endanger employee health and, in extreme cases, can lead to fatal outcomes. The debate surrounding these issues is now at the forefront, with calls for stricter regulations on employee welfare, mental health support in the workplace, and a rethinking of the role of managers in safeguarding their teams' well-being.

While many corporations claim to prioritize the health of their employees, the deaths of Anna Sebastian Perayil, May, and Sadaf Fatima highlight the gap between policy and practice. This raises crucial questions about corporate accountability and the need for stronger oversight on the mental and physical toll of modern work environments.