Arguing before judge MS Azmi, Mallya's lawyer Amit Desai said his client is a non-resident Indian (NRI) with a permanent address in London and he had substantial business overseas as well as in India
New Delhi: Fugitive liquor baron and industrialist Vijay Mallya left the country in "normal course" and not under suspicious circumstances as claimed by investigating agencies, his lawyer told a court in Mumbai on Thursday.
A special court for Prevention of Money Laundering Act (PMLA) cases is hearing the Enforcement Directorate's (ED) plea to declare Vijay Mallya a fugitive under the Fugitive Economic Offenders (FEO) Act.
The former chief of the now-defunct Kingfisher Airlines is wanted for committing alleged bank frauds of Rs 9,000 crore, and is currently holed up in the UK, fighting several cases.
On June 22, the ED had moved the Special PMLA Court to declare Mallya a ‘fugitive economic offender’ and confiscate all his properties, estimated at more Rs 12,000 crore, making it the first such case of its kind under the new FEOA law.
Arguing before judge MS Azmi, Mallya's lawyer Amit Desai said his client is a non-resident Indian (NRI) with a permanent address in London and he had substantial business overseas as well as in India.
Vijay Mallya is accused by the ED of defaulting on bank loans to the tune of Rs. 9,000 crore. He is also accused of diverting some of the loan amount.
Advocate Desai, while opposing the ED plea, said that Mallya had cooperated with the Debts Recovery Tribunal in its proceedings in relation to the loans given to his firms.
He left the country for London on March 2, 2016 via Germany, where he attended a conference of World Motorsports as a director, Desai said. Mallya was then one of the owners Force India, a Formula One team, he added.
The investigating agencies had claimed that he left the county under suspicious circumstances.
Desai, however, argued that "Mallya left the country in normal course and before any case was registered against him."
Further, FEO Act is a draconian law as it permits confiscation of a person's property even before the trial starts, he said.
"As per the criminal procedure, property is confiscated only after the accused is held guilty. Under this law, the question of confiscation of property comes even before the first witness is examined," he said.
ED counsel DP Singh rebutted Vijay Mallya's defence that he cannot return to India because of the conditions of the bail granted by a court in the United Kingdom which restrain him from leaving the country.
Mallya can give an undertaking before the UK court that he wants to return to India, Singh said.
The arguments will continue today.
Read Exclusive COVID-19 Coronavirus News updates, at MyNation.